Home--Campaigns--Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola Forced to Announce Ambitious Water Conservation Plans

By Amit Srivastava
India Resource Center
July 11, 2007

On June 30, the India Resource Center organized a protest at the brand new Coca-Cola's museum in Atlanta - the World of Coke.

Banner at Coca-Cola Museum
Banner at Coca-Cola Museum Photo: A. Samulon/India Resource Center
Why Coca-Cola? Because the company is guilty of creating severe water shortages and pollution around its bottling plants all across India. Communities around Coca-Cola's bottling plants are left without water for drinking, cooking and farming, and also with polluted land and water.

It was very fitting that we converged upon the Coca-Cola museum, a world of make-believe set up by the company to assure itself and its consumers that its products 'refreshes' everyone it touches.

The reality, as thousands of people in India know it, is very different.

We went to Coca-Cola's museum with a large picture of women protesting against the company's bottling plant in Mehdiganj in India in the scorching heat in May. We wanted the Coca-Cola company to include the picture of the protesters against its operations in India in the museum, to help the Coca-Cola museum get closer to the 'real thing.'

Company officials, in typical fashion, chose not to accept our contribution to the museum, opting instead to continue with a very well manufactured, glossy representation of the Coke side of life.

Such is the Coke side of life. We call it greenwashing.

Growing Campaign

The international campaign to hold Coca-Cola accountable for its crimes in India is growing, and it has never been stronger. Over 25 colleges and universities in the US, UK and Canada have removed Coca-Cola products from their campuses as a result of the campaign. Just in the last six months, Manchester University in the UK, the University of Guelph in Canada and Smith College in the US have taken actions to remove Coca-Cola from campus.

The Coca-Cola company has also been dropped from the prestigious $8 billion TIAA-CREF Social Choice Account fund because of the company's questionable environmental practices in India. TIAA-CREF is one of the largest financial services companies in the United States, with over $380 billion in assets.

The campaign has been characterized by the Wall Street Journal as having cost the Coca-Cola company " millions of dollars in lost sales and legal fees in India, and growing damage to its reputation elsewhere."

The international campaign has put the Coca-Cola company of the defensive, even leading Neville Isdell, their CEO, to publicly state that "mistakes have been made in India."

Coke Protest Picture for Museum
Coke Protest Picture for Museum Photo: A. Samulon/India Resource Center
The increasing pressure has forced the Coca-Cola to do some serious rethinking about the way in which they deal with the growing crisis in India. The company has opted, to our disappointment, to engage further in a public relations drive, hoping that the issues in India will somehow go away.

Campaign Forces Coca-Cola's Ambitious Plans

Last month, the Coca-Cola company announced, to much fanfare, a three-year, US$20 million partnership with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) to "conserve and protect freshwater resources."

The partnership with the WWF comes directly as a response to the growing campaign against Coca-Cola for abusing water resources in India.

At face value, such an announcement is obviously welcome. After all, who would object to water conservation projects in a world where over 1 billion people still lack access to clean drinking water?

But the announcement by Coca-Cola deserves scrutiny - something sorely lacking from the media and even NGO's - primarily because it is the Coca-Cola company that is announcing water conservation projects.

We suspect that the announcement is an attempt to deflect the growing criticism of its operations in India.

The Coca-Cola company claims that it will be "returning all water that it uses for manufacturing processes to the environment" by 2010.

Is this wishful thinking?

Unsustainable Relationship with Water

As the India Resource Center has established, the Coca-Cola company has an extremely unsustainable relationship with water, a precious and increasingly scarce natural resource.

The company's insatiable thirst for water - the company used 290 billion liters of water in 2006 alone, enough to meet the entire world's drinking water needs for 10 days - does not even begin to tell the whole story.

The Coca-Cola company converted two-thirds of the freshwater it used into wastewater. The company used the vast majority of the freshwater it uses for cleaning in its production process, and the result is that the Coca-Cola company is a champion of turning perfectly fine (and increasingly scarce) freshwater into wastewater.

Protest Against Coca-Cola
Protest Against Coca-Cola in Mehdiganj, May 2007 Photo: A. Srivastava/India Resource Center
Such an abusive relationship with water is downright criminal, particularly coming from a company that describes itself as a "hydration" company and whose annual environmental report reads like a grant proposal from a group working solely on water conservation.

In India, where the company claims to return a "substantial" portion of the water they use back to the environment, the company has no numbers to back it up. When challenged, one of their managers provided numbers that amounted to 8% of the water being returned to the environment. Substantial? Hardly. But does it sound good? Definitely.

Ignoring India

For the communities in India struggling against Coca-Cola's misuse of water resources, however, the announcement of the $20 million partnership with WWF falls way short of what is required of the Coca-Cola company.

First and foremost, the Coca-Cola company must adopt fundamental operational changes in the manner in which it operates in India. So far, the company has chosen to respond to the charges in India through its formidable public relations machinery, and no amount of "spin" will make the problems go away.

Secondly, the partnership with the World Wildlife Fund, ostensibly to conserve and protect freshwater, does not include India. While many are grateful that India is excluded from their list, it is also befuddling that the company has chosen to ignore the country where it has arguably done the most harm to water resources.

A Drop in the Bucket

For a company that has an annual advertising budget of $2.4 billion, an investment of $20 million in a global water conservation project - less than 1% of its advertising budget alone - is truly a drop in the bucket.

In fact, it would not be unrealistic to wager that the Coca-Cola company will spend more on advertising its water conservation efforts than on the water conservation projects itself!

And for a company with a market capitalization of $100 billion, the sincerity of Coca-Cola's investment in water conservation becomes even clearer. The company is investing a meager 0.002% of what it is worth to conserve water.

Water is Life  or Coke's or Greenwash?
Water is Life or Coke's Greenwash? Photo: A. Samulon/India Resource Center
Given the Coca-Cola company's past record of manufacturing an image of itself that it clearly is not, we remain extremely skeptical that the current announcement to conserve water is anything else than another attempt to do just that - greenwash.

The Macmillan English Dictionary defines greenwash as:
"to try to convince people that you are doing something which is good for the environment by being involved in small, environmentally-friendly initiatives, especially as a way of hiding your involvement in activities which are damaging to the environment."

In India, where Coca-Cola wastes even more water than their global average, the company has announced separately that it will have a 'Net Zero' water balance by 2009.

We will be keeping a close eye on Coca-Cola's stated goals and achievements.

It is, after all, the international campaign that has forced the Coca-Cola company to announce such ambitious plans. Perhaps the campaign's scrutiny on their stated objectives will force the company to actually make good on their committments and make the necessary changes?

Are we now engaging in wishful thinking? We hope not. Too many lives and livelihoods are at stake.

Amit Srivastava is the coordinator of India Resource Center <www.IndiaResource.org>, a central organization in the international campaign to hold the Coca-Cola company accountable for its abuses in India.




PRESS: Coca-Cola Forced to Abandon $25 Million Project in India

PRESS: Coca-Cola Expansion Plans Rejected

PRESS: Coca-Cola Plant Shut Down in India, Authorities Cancel License

STUDY: Coca-Cola’s Operations in India Lead to “Tragedy of the Commons”

PRESS: 15 Village Councils Reject Coca-Cola Plans as Opposition Grows

Mehdiganj - The Issues

PRESS: Coca-Cola Expansion Plan Opposed in Mehdiganj, India

Support Us

Join Us

>>  More Stories


 

 

 
Home | About | How to Use this Site | Sitemap | Privacy Policy

India Resource Center (IRC) is a project of Global Resistance -- "Building Global Links for Justice"
URL: http://www.IndiaResource.org Email:info (AT) IndiaResource.org