|
Home--Issues--Globalization
Public Health System in Shambles Due to Lack
of Financing
By Ravi Duggal
Third World Network Features
April 2, 2003
While the Indian government has provided various incentives for the
development of private healthcare services in the country, the public
health sector has suffered from a lack of funding. The structural
adjustment and economic reforms programme that began in 1992 caused
a further shrinking of resource allocations for public health services,
and the introduction of user fees struck the final blow for the poor,
who represent the majority of users of public health facilities.
Historically, India has always had a very large private health sector,
especially for mobile services which cover providers of modern medicine
as well as traditional practitioners. Until the mid-1970s, hospital
services operated predominantly in the public domain. Medical education
was almost a public monopoly until the late 1980s, after which the
private sector grew rapidly. However, even today 75% of medical graduates
are from public medical schools.
Since the mid-1970s, however, the State has provided various incentives
like concessional land and tax breaks for setting up private hospitals
and tax exemptions for imports. The private pharmaceutical industry
has also received substantial State patronage through patent laws,
subsidised bulk drug purchases from public sector companies and protection
from multinational corporations.
While the Indian State has been committed constitutionally to providing
healthcare to its citizens via the Principles of State Policy directive,
healthcare provision was not a fundamental right. Over the years,
various healthcare entitlements were created like one primary health
centre (PHC) per 30,000 population, one referral hospital per five
PHCs and one civil hospital per district. But resources for healthcare
have been very limited and hence public healthcare has remained largely
underdeveloped.
In the 1990s, the public health sector was woefully neglected with
new public investments virtually stopping. In addition, user charges
and the contracting out of services were introduced. During the same
period the private health sector, including the hospital sector, expanded
rapidly.
In addition to the lack of funding of public health services, the
structural adjustment and economic reforms programme that began in
1992 caused a further shrinking of resource allocations for public
health services. The recovery has been marginal but the introduction
of user fees struck the final blow for the poor, who still represent
the vast majority of users of public health facilities.
Other evidence of the collapse of public health facilities is from
the national survey of public health infrastructure, which reveals
that in 1999-2000, critical public health facilities were grossly
inadequate. The 2002 National Health Policy acknowledges this severe
indictment and recommends that public health investment and expenditures
need to be more than doubled in the next five years in order to provide
a reasonable level of primary healthcare.
The above trend is a global phenomenon that is well documented in
the 2003 Social Watch Report. This report focuses on the privatisation
of basic social services and documents the shift from social contracts
to private contracts for services like health, education and water.
The background papers of the 2004 World Development Report by the
World Bank further debunk the government provision model for basic
services in favour of private contracts, thereby encouraging this
shift. The Social Watch Report declares access to basic services as
a human right and advocates maintaining the social contract for these
basic services since these promote equity and universality and ensure
a minimum level of access for all.
For a country like India, which still has to contend with mass poverty,
this situation is not good and needs to be radically changed. We need
to maintain the social contract paradigm and prevent healthcare from
becoming an economic commodity. CEHAT (the Centre for Enquiry into
Health and Allied Themes) recommends three main action points:
- The healthcare system needs to be organised into a single, regulated
system. Under the prevailing circumstances, this will have to
be a public-private mix. The financing of such a system will have
to be through a single player mechanism that would be an autonomous
collective entity that pools all the resources: from those who
pay insurance premiums and those (about 60% of the population)
who will have their premiums paid by the State.
- The medical profession will have to reorganise under the proposed
system and introduce self-regulation so that the norms laid down
are adhered to.
- Healthcare should be proclaimed a fundamental human right through
an Act of Parliament.
Ravi Duggal is Coordinator of the Centre for Enquiry into Health
and Allied Themes (CEHAT), Mumbai, India (www. cehat. org).
|
|


Vedanta Ravages Through India
Post Tsunami: Waves of Neglect
Indian Guinea Pigs for Sale: Outsourcing Clinical Trials
No Space for Delhi's Poor
Sterlite Brings Darkness to India's Indigenous Peoples
Sahara and the Sunderbans: Ecotourism or Megatourism?
Blinkered View: Third World Medical Researchers Get Short Shrift
Midnight 'Coolies' in the Sunshine Sector
The
Meaning of Cancun
Monsanto,
Unilever Use Child Labor in India
IL&FS- Financing
Infrastructure in India
USAID - Pushing
Privatization
>> More
Stories
|