|
|
|
Home--Issues--Globalization
Vedanta: The Serial Offender
by Roger Moody
Mines and Communities
July 29, 2008
In November 2007, the Norwegian government's vast Pension (Oil) Fund
disinvested all its shares in Vedanta Resources plc, a UK company
which few have even heard of, and whose parlous record has been virtually
ignored by the British press. The Nordic government, acting on advice
from its Council on Ethics, was unflinching:
"The allegations levelled at [Vedanta] regarding environmental damage
and complicity in human rights violations, including abuse and forced
eviction of tribal peoples, are well founded. The company seems to
be lacking the interest and will to do anything about the severe and
lasting damage that its activities inflict on people and the environment."
Vedanta was launched on the London Stock Exchange in December 2003
by incorporating the key assets of a thirty-year old Indian enterprise
called Sterlite. The Initial Public Offering (IPO) was engineered
by HSBC, Citigroup, Australia's Macquarie Bank, Deutsche Bank, ICICI
Securities India, and JPMorgan Cazenove; between them they reaped
around £13 million in joint service fees. The following year, thanks
to a US$ 700 million bond issue made by ABN Amro, Barclays Capital
and Deutsche Bank, the company embarked on a US$ 2.2 billion expansion
programme with the aim of becoming India's biggest copper and aluminium
producer. Shortly afterwards, Vedanta also acquired Zambia's leading
copper company, KCM; and, in 2007, it bought 51% of Sesa Goa, India's
largest exporter of iron ore.
With a current share capital of just under £5 billion the company
is ruled by its London-based founder and 54% shareholder, Anil Agarwal,
whose prior exploits in his home country had already marked him out
as a controversial figure. In 1998, for example, Sterlite was found
guilty of participating in a massive self-serving shares' scam, as
a result of which the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
initially banned it from trading for two years.
The sparse attention given Vedanta by the UK press has centred on
its operations in Orissa.. On July 17th BBC's Ten O'Clock News ran
a story pitching the "fate" of a "remote Indian tribe", the Dongaria
Khonds, against this "global mining firm", as a 3-year long battle
appeared near to its conclusion. At the centre of the conflict is
the lush, bauxite-rich, Nyamgiri mountain range, revered by the Khonds
as a sacred site, and coveted by the company to provide raw material
for a nearby alumina refinery. According to several leading ecologists,
if Vedanta proceeds with its mining plan, 660 hectares of prime forest
will be destroyed, and up to a hundred streams dry up, threatening
the vital Vansadhara river that irrigates the plains. Site clearance
for the refinery had already started in 2004 without permission from
India's Environment and Forest ministry (MoEF). Two villages were
razed to the ground that year and the occupants brutally removed by
police to a concrete colony, swiftly dubbed by critics a "concentration
camp".
After petitions by three Indian environmental and human rights organisations,
a sub-committee of the Supreme Court (SC) soon set out to investigate
Vedanta's alleged violations. In September 2005 the committee unequivocally
rejected the mining of Niyamgiri, demanding Vedanta also answer for
illegally constructing the refinery. However, in early 2006, the SC
side-stepped the verdict of its own subcommittee, referring the matter
to a government advisory group which then approved diversion of forest
land for the mining project subject to certain conditions. The debate
rumbled on until late last year when the SC made an extraordinarily
quixotic interim ruling: citing the Norwegian government's damning
report, it banned Vedanta from the Nyamgiri Hills, but invited its
Sterlite subsidiary to submit a plan for the same purpose. Since then,
Orissa's own State Pollution Control Board has found the Vedanta refinery
guilty of polluting the Vansadhara river. At the time of writing,
the Supreme Court's final judgment has not been delivered, but many
observers fear the worst.
[The Supreme Court of India heard the case
on July 25, 2008 and reserved judgment. The judges are expected to
deliberate further on setting up the "modalities and conditions" under
which the mining activities could proceed. The judgement is now expected
anytime.- Editors at India Resource Center]
The dramatic stand-off between the Khonds, their numerous supporters,
and the most powerful mining company operating in India, is undoubtedly
significant. It has become a test case for implementation of the government's
draft new forest policy, which theoretically grants tribal peoples
(Adivasi) rights to territory previously denied them. Nonetheless,
it has been up to a small group of UK protestors, working in concert
with overseas colleagues, to draw attention to Vedanta's other abuses
in Zambia, Armenia, and elsewhere in India. They have done so by publishing
a major critique ("Ravages through India", 2005), posting numerous
critical reports on the internet [see www.minesandcommunities.org] and challenging the board and
Vedanta shareholders at all its AGMs.
This year on July 31st, dissident shareholders will demand the company
address criticisms in an Indian MoEF report of October 2007, which
hammered Vedanta's Chhattisgarh-based subsidiary, Balco, for its "deplorably
callous and casual attitude" to environmental appraisal of expanding
bauxite mining in the state. The same month, Vedanta was indicted
for wilfully using a defective pipeline to dispose of highly toxic
tailings from its Zambian copper mine, and constructing the country's
premier copper smelter without official permission; it still has to
answer convincingly to these charges.
But slowly the net is folding around this "serial corporate offender"
In June 2008, Vedanta/Sterlite agreed to buy out north American copper
company, Asarco, in a cut price deal which would absolve the UK company
of responsibility for meeting billions of dollars in outstanding personal
injury and environmental restitution claims. Unexpectedly, and after
priming by three major US environmental watchdogs, members of the
powerful Congress Judiciary Committee have urged the federal Attorney
General to scrutinise Vedanta/Sterlite's environmental record in India
and Zambia before allowing the take over to proceed.
All the more regrettable, then, that the global banks bulwarking the
company, and its most important UK shareholder (AXA Framlington),
have failed to demand anything approaching this level of accountability.
To echo the Norwegian government's conclusion:
"[Vedanta's] violations against the environment and human rights…
are recurrent at all the subsidiaries subject to investigation and
have taken place over many years, indicat[ing] a pattern in the company's
practices where [they] are accepted and make up an established part
of its business activities."
Roger Moody is an experienced international researcher and
campaigner and the managing editor of the Mines
and Communities website. The article above first appeared in Ecumenical
Council for Corporate Responsiblity Bulletin, London, August 2008.
|
|


No Space for Delhi's Poor
Sterlite Brings Darkness to India's Indigenous Peoples
Sahara and the Sunderbans: Ecotourism or Megatourism?
Blinkered View: Third World Medical Researchers Get Short Shrift
Midnight 'Coolies' in the Sunshine Sector
The
Meaning of Cancun
Monsanto,
Unilever Use Child Labor in India
IL&FS- Financing
Infrastructure in India
USAID - Pushing
Privatization
>> More
Stories
|