Home--News
India Looks to Open Agriculture to US Corporates
Sourav Mishra
Down To Earth
March 15, 2006
It seems times have changed. Information technology is out and agriculture
is in. The thrust on agriculture is now enshrined in the draft of
the Indo- us Knowledge initiative on Agricultural Research & Education,
which is the agenda for us President George Bush when he comes to
India in March 2006. Prime minister Manmohan Singh said in July 2005
during his us visit, “We owe our green revolution to America. Now
we can herald a second green revolution with the American assistance.”
This statement cleared the decks for big time us entry into Indian
agriculture. Though agriculture has been prioritised, supposedly for
public good, not a single bit of information has been made public.
Neither scientists nor farmers have any clue about the initiative.
The authorities make it clear that nothing is being disclosed because
of the impact on the budget session. Down To Earth has managed to
unearth the following disquieting facts.
Knowledge or trade?
The so-called knowledge initiative has the world’s largest retailer
Walmart and second largest seed corporation Monsanto on the board
from the US side. While the Indian business community is represented
by Venkateshwara Hatcheries. The board is co-chaired by Mangla Rai,
Director General of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
and Ellen Terpstra, administrator, Foreign Agricultural Services,
United States Department of Agriculture.
On February 14, 2005, the board of 14 members (seven from each side)
prepared a draft focusing on four areas —education, food processing,
biotechnology and water management. The Indian scientific community
criticises the presence of the corporate sector and areas chosen.
Eminent geneticist Suman Sahai says, “The areas chosen are best suited
to American needs only. India needs more of low-end technologies at
this stage for its subsistence level farmers. The high-end technology
will only solve the business purpose of the multinationals on the
board.” Ranjana Smetacek, director, corporate affairs, Monsanto India
says, “ We will continue our work of providing improved technologies
for betterment of Indian farmers.” Monsanto brought Bt technology
for pest resistance in cotton to India.
Food and trade analyst Devinder Sharma says, “India has become a dumping
yard for redundant technologies of all kinds. Besides American technology
in agriculture is high-input based, as the farmer population there
is mere 7 lakh. But for 70-crore Indian farmers such costly inputs
can only bring more suicides.” A recent research by entomologist K
R Kranthi of the Central Institute for Cotton Research revealed how
Bt technology is 10 times less effective against the Indian pest than
its American counterpart. Seeds with such a technology are sold at
five times the price of normal seeds resulting in heavy debts for
farmers.
Inappropriate help
Suman Sahai says, “Earlier a private company like Monsanto only had
the status of a business entity now they can ask the director-general
of icar to get our vast genetic wealth from any of its more than 200
research establishments. The private companies can develop gene patents
and sell them at a much higher price.” This concern can’t be denied
as Madelyn E Spirnak, senior advisor biotechnology, USDA clarifies,
“The us goal is to make sure that the Indian biotechnology markets
remain open.” The us goals could make the farmer-friendly Protection
of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights Act redundant.
“The Indian agricultural research system is the largest in the world.
It has successfully produced more than 3,500 varieties of crops. We
are world’s largest milk producer and rank second in foodgrain, fruit
& vegetable production. This proves that American help is not needed
at all,” says a scientist from ICAR on condition of anonymity.
“If India thinks we can learn from American agriculture, it mustn’t
forget their success is sustained on a subsidy of $ 100-billion per
year, which is one seventh of India’s GDP,” says Sharma.
The presence of Walmart is also questioned. “The company has the worst
record in agriculture retailing as it crashes prices to rock-bottom
levels forcing farmers either to sell them at lower prices or perish,”
says Aroonim Barua, a Delhi-based retail consultant.
An official in the Union ministry of agriculture says the Indo-US
initiative will cost India over 1000 crores with the us not spending
a single penny.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|