| Home--News Arrogance and Impunity - Coca-Cola in India 
 By Amit Srivastava
 India Resource Center
 August 10, 2006 
            
            How long will it take before the powers that be in India refuse to 
            allow multinationals to treat Indians as guinea pigs? 
            
            In what can only be characterized as arrogance and impunity, we are 
            learning that Coca-Cola and Pepsi have continued to sell soft drinks 
            in India with dangerously high levels of pesticides - three years 
            after even the government of India confirmed that these products were 
            dangerous. 
            
            Perhaps the cola companies know something that we do not? Are Indians 
            immune to high levels of pesticides? It is time for the cola companies 
            to provide details of the studies they must have conducted to convince 
            themselves that the average Indian can consume pesticides safely at 
            levels 24 times the average American and European.
 
It is difficult to fathom the business logic of a company that boasts 
            of having one global standard, yet three years after being rapped 
            by the Indian government, continues to sell products in India without 
            making any improvements. 
            
            The pesticides in soft drinks in India is a classic case of double 
            standards, one for Americans and Europeans, and another for Indians. 
            Coca-Cola products made in India could never be sold in the European 
            Union markets or the United States. On at least 10 occasions since 
            January 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration has rejected the 
            shipment of Coca-Cola products made in India coming into the US, on 
            the grounds that they do not conform to US laws and that they are 
            unsafe for the US public. 
            
            Both the cola companies' excuse that they have met the (non-existent) 
            norms for soft drinks in India falls flat in its face. In this day 
            and age of globalization, standards are also globalized. The onus 
            is upon the global companies to provide a product that is safe for 
            consumers. Period. If a product is unsafe for Americans, it is also 
            unsafe for Indians. It is the responsibility of Coca-Cola and Pepsi 
            to clean out the contaminants from the raw materials before bringing 
            it to market. 
            
            It is indeed ironic that on the one hand, these very companies argue 
            for global rules for trade and corporate investment, but when challenged 
            for their misdeeds, try to invoke local and national laws. 
            
            Unfortunately, the cola companies' transgressions run much deeper 
            in India, both figuratively and literally. 
            
            In various parts of India, from Plachimada in south India to Mehdiganj 
            in north India, communities living around Coca-Cola bottling plants 
            are experiencing severe water shortages. The communities accuse the 
            Coca-Cola company of creating water shortages because of over extraction 
            of water and pollution of the scarce remaining water. 
            
            And the communities have the numbers to back it up. Tests conducted 
            by the Central Pollution Control Board, for example, found excessive 
            levels of lead and cadmium in all of the Coca-Cola waste it surveyed 
            in bottling plants across the country, leading the CPCB to order the 
            Coca-Cola company to treat its waste as hazardous waste. Prior to 
            the CPCB study, the Coca-Cola company was distributing its toxic waste 
            to farmers around its bottling plants, as fertilizer! Test results 
            released just two weeks ago have confirmed that the water is also 
            polluted, making it unfit for human consumption. 
            
            In Plachimada, Kerala, one of Coca-Cola's largest bottling plants 
            has been shut down since March 2004 because of the intense community 
            opposition to the plant. The Kerala State Pollution Control Board 
            has also issued a stop order notice to the company's bottling plant 
            because of the pollution by the plant. 
            
            In a highly irresponsible practice, the Coca-Cola company has located 
            many of its bottling plants in India in "drought prone" areas, areas 
            that were already experiencing severe water crisis. In Rajasthan, 
            for example, a study by the Central Ground Water Board found that 
            water tables had dropped 10 meters in just five years since Coca-Cola 
            began its bottling operations in Kala Dera. 
            
            A formidable movement has emerged in India from these communities 
            to challenge the Coca-Cola company for its indiscriminate exploitation 
            of water resources and pollution. 
            
            As with the pesticide issue, the Coca-Cola company has challenged 
            every study that has been produced implicating it for its wrongdoings. 
            The company has also hired a high-priced lobbyist in New Delhi whose 
            job, according to the International Herald Tribune, was to 
            "ensure, among other things, that every government or private study 
            accusing the company of environmental harm was challenged by another 
            study." 
            
            Arrogance? You bet. Impunity? No doubt. 
            
            Communities in India impacted by Coca-Cola's practices enjoy tremendous 
            support internationally, and the global movement to hold the company 
            accountable for its abuses in India is having a major impact. The 
            prestigious University of Michigan, for example, has placed the Coca-Cola 
            company on probation until it is able to convince the administration 
            that it is taking steps to rectify its wrongdoings in India. 
            
            The Coca-Cola company has been forced to acknowledge the growing discontent 
            around its operations in India, but it is doing too little, too late. 
            It has, instead, revved up its public relations machinery, a far cry 
            from what the communities are demanding. 
            
            As India grapples with setting standards for soft drinks to ensure 
            consumer safety, it should also urgently act to protect communities 
            across the country reeling from water shortages, courtesy Coca-Cola. 
            
            It may surprise many to know that Coca-Cola and Pepsi pay nothing 
            for the water that they use in India, which runs in the hundreds of 
            millions of liters every day. It is also a very wasteful industry, 
            particularly when it comes to the valuable resource of water. It takes 
            Coca-Cola nearly four liters of freshwater to produce one liter of 
            product. In other words, the company converts seventy five percent 
            of the freshwater it extracts into wastewater, which in turn has contaminated 
            the scarce remaining groundwater and land. 
            
            The entire life-cycle of Coca-Cola - from the extraction of water 
            to the delivery of the pesticide laden product- is wrought with problems. 
            
            In India, Coca-Cola uses the slogan in Hindi -Life ho toh aisi 
            - Life should be like this. 
            
            We don't think so. 
            
            For more information, visit www.IndiaResource.org 
            
            Amit Srivastava is the coordinator of India Resource Center, an 
            international campaigning organization working to challenge abuses 
            by multinational corporations.|  Coca-Cola Quit India
 |  |
 FAIR USE NOTICE.  This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |