| Home--News Coca-Cola Sued for Groundwater Pollution in Michigan 
 By Chris Killian
 mlive.com
 April 28, 2010 
            
            The accumulation of juice wastes sprayed over more than 40 years 
            on fields behind the plant caused a condition in the soil that releases 
            naturally occurring iron, manganese and arsenic particles into groundwater, 
            according to the MDEQ. Monitoring wells near the former spray fields 
            have shown levels of these heavy metals above current federal limits. 
            There is a plume of heavy metals and contaminants that has tainted 
            more than 20 wells east of the plant. Coca Cola provides bottled water 
            for those whose water is contaminated. 
            
            PAW PAW — Eighty current and former Paw Paw residents are suing the 
            Coca-Cola Co., seeking damages for groundwater contamination they 
            say has been caused by the company’s Minute Maid juice plant in Paw 
            Paw Township. 
            
            The seven-count complaint, filed Monday in Van Buren County Circuit 
            Court by New York City law firm Weitz & Luxenberg P.C., alleges the 
            chemical nutrients and cleaning agents in wastewater that was sprayed 
            on fields near the plant for more than 30 years robbed the soil of 
            oxygen and released metals that contaminated groundwater, which is 
            used by many residents in the area. 
            
            The suit was filed to “protect plaintiffs, whose properties have been 
            and will continue to be contaminated and whose health has been and 
            will continue to be harmed by chemical pollutants including, but not 
            limited to, manganese, lead, iron and arsenic, that have entered the 
            environment as a result of the activities of Coca-Cola,” according 
            to court documents. 
            
            In a statement, Coca-Cola North America said it was “very disappointed 
            in this unjustified action” and is “taking responsible steps to do 
            the right thing with residents and regulators and to meet our legal 
            obligations.” 
            
            The company said it is working with the state to address the groundwater 
            issues and stopped spraying wastewater on fields at the Paw Paw plant. 
            It has invested $10 million in a wastewater-treatment facility and 
            improvements, the company statement said, and is providing bottled 
            water to some homes and business that may have been affected by local 
            groundwater conditions. 
            
            The suit, the company statement said, “is not the best way to help 
            the community and costs us resources that would be better used to 
            support and create jobs and to continue to work cooperatively with 
            the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment to investigate, 
            identify and implement responses to groundwater issues. 
            
            ”We are members of this community and care about its well-being, whereas 
            plaintiff’s attorneys do not share that concern.” 
            
            Plaintiffs are seeking restitution for damages ranging from reduced 
            property values to the cost to clean up the contamination, said Robin 
            Greenwald, head of the Environmental and Toxic Torts Unit at Weitz 
            & Luxenberg. Other plaintiffs named in the suit allege health issues, 
            including gastrointestinal, kidney and central nervous system disorders. 
            
            The suit does not state how much the plaintiffs are seeking in damages, 
            but Greenwald said it would likely be “in the millions” of dollars. 
            
            “This is not going to be a quick fix,” Greenwald said. “For years, 
            no one had any idea there was contamination. They just recently found 
            out.” 
            
            The law firm regularly collaborates with environmental activist Erin 
            Brockovich, whose legal team last summer indicated it planned to file 
            a lawsuit against Coca-Cola for its alleged contamination of groundwater 
            near the plant, located at 38279 Red Arrow Highway. 
            
            Spraying of wastewater from food-processing facilities is a common 
            and legal practice. But when organic matter is sprayed in excess over 
            fields, it can rob the soil of oxygen and cause metals such as iron, 
            arsenic, manganese and lead to leach into the water supply. 
            
            The Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment and Coca-Cola 
            have agreed that sampled water near the plant’s former spray fields 
            has amounts of heavy metals that exceed state standards. 
            
            The health effects of drinking water with high levels of arsenic are 
            relatively unknown. The DNRE’s website says ingesting high levels 
            of arsenic can cause skin discoloration and cancer. 
            
            The company has said they have been working with the state over the 
            past several years to address the concentration of metals in the groundwater 
            and have submitted a draft remedial-investigation report. Coca-Cola 
            has been supplying more than 20 Paw Paw Township residents with bottled 
            water for more than a year as a precaution. 
            
            Juice wastes have been sprayed on fields near the Coca-Cola plant 
            since 1961. Various companies operated the plant over the years until 
            Coca-Cola’s Minute Maid unit bought the facility in 1979. Coca-Cola 
            paid $50,000 in fines to the state for oversaturating its spray fields 
            and allowing wastewater to drain to adjacent property. In 2002, Coca-Cola 
            built its own wastewater-treatment plant, eliminating the need for 
            spray fields.
 FAIR USE NOTICE.  This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |